Used Zammad version: 6.4.1-1741933941.0923b150.bookworm
Used Zammad installation type: package
Operating system: Debian 12
Browser + version: any
Expected behavior:
checkmk-integration: Ticket title should include the hostname and service name (on a service-problem)
Actual behavior:
checkmk-integration: Ticket title contain only the hostname
detailed explanation:
*We are switching our monitoring from icinga to checkmk.
The zammad integration (System / Integrations/ checkmk) works smooth.
Unfortunately, in the case of a service problem, only the hostname is displayed in the ticket title
We would like to display the service name and hostname and not just the host name in the ticket title, as was possible with the emails through Icinga.
an Example:
Ticket title (generated by an e-mail from icinga)
[PROBLEM] Updates on webserver is CRITICAL!
Ticket title (generated by checkmk integration)
webserver is CRITICAL
and in the ticket-article is the info about the problematic service
like:
EventID: 29887
Host: webserver.xxxxxxxx
Service: APT Updates
State: CRITICAL
Text: 1 normal updates(!), 6 security updates (php8.2-readline…)
My understanding is that Zammad generates this ticket using the CheckMK integration.
The sample script from the Zammad CheckMK integration page doesn’t have an explicit field for the ticket title. Therefore, I assume that Zammad’s coding itself creates the ticket title.
Is it possible to configure the ticket title to be linked to the hostname and service name? like
on is
APT Updates on webserver is CRITICAL
how can this be done ?
or is it a feature request ?
However, the linked issue mentions that CheckMK sends emails and Zammd converts these emails into tickets.
In my case, I’m talking about the Zammad integration checkMK.
CheckMk is talking with zammad via an curl request to an zammad endpoint (URL).
These are probably somewhat different (even though similar) things.
I wouldn’t wonder if the culprit is the same / a similar one.
But sure, you can create another bug report and mention the old one as possible duplicate. Don’t know.